Current:Home > BackMichigan continues overhaul of gun laws with extended firearm ban for misdemeanor domestic violence-InfoLens
Michigan continues overhaul of gun laws with extended firearm ban for misdemeanor domestic violence
View Date:2024-12-23 15:29:35
LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Michigan Democrats who have transformed gun laws in the state in the wake of multiple mass school shootings are now making it more difficult for individuals with convictions for misdemeanor domestic violence from gaining access to guns.
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signed legislation Monday that prohibits individuals convicted of a misdemeanor related to domestic violence from possessing firearms for at least an eight-year-period. State law currently includes firearm restrictions for those with felonies related to domestic abuse, but no law had existed for misdemeanor domestic violence.
“These bills are based on a simple idea: if you have been found guilty in court for violently assaulting your partner, you should not be able to access a deadly weapon that you could use to further threatened, harm or kill them.” Whitmer said at a bill signing in Kalamazoo. “It’s just common sense.”
The eight-year ban for misdemeanor domestic violence convictions is only the latest firearm restriction added to Michigan law since Democrats took control of both chambers of the state Legislature and retained the governor’s office last election.
Legislation implementing red flag laws, stricter background checks and safe storage requirements were all signed by Whitmer earlier this year. The overhauled gun laws follow two deadly mass school shootings that happened in Michigan within a 14-month period.
Democratic State Sen. Stephanie Chang, a lead sponsor of the bill package, said Monday that the latest legislation would put Michigan in line with similar laws in 31 other states and the District of Columbia.
Federal law already prohibits those charged with felonies or misdemeanors related to domestic violence from purchasing or possessing a gun. But advocates have pushed for state-level laws that they say can be better enforced and won’t be threatened by future Supreme Court rulings.
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court took up a challenge to a federal law that prohibits people from having guns if they are under a court order to stay away from their spouse, partner or other family members. The nation’s high court heard arguments on Nov. 7 and seemed likely to preserve the federal law.
“As the Supreme Court weighs whether to uphold common-sense laws to disarm domestic abusers, Governor Whitmer and the Michigan legislature are taking a clear stand: If you have a history of intimate partner violence, you have no business owning a gun,” John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety, said in a statement.
Firearms are the most common weapon used in homicides of spouses, intimate partners, children or relatives in recent years, according to data from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guns were used in more than half, 57%, of those killings in 2020, a year that saw an overall increase in domestic violence during the coronavirus pandemic.
Under the legislation signed Monday in Michigan, people convicted of a misdemeanor that involved domestic violence will be not allowed to purchase, possess, or use a firearm or ammunition until they have completed the terms of imprisonment, paid all fines and eight years had passed.
The parents of Maggie Wardle, a 19-year-old shot and killed by an ex-boyfriend at Kalamazoo College in 1999, spoke in support of the legislation at Monday’s signing.
“This law, now passed and signed into law today, will save someone’s life and give them the chance to live a full meaningful life, the chance Maggie did not get,” Rick Omillian, Maggie’s stepfather, said Monday.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Former NFL coach Jack Del Rio charged with operating vehicle while intoxicated
- These $26 Amazon Flats Come in 31 Colors & Have 3,700+ Five-Star Reviews
- Why Are Hurricanes Like Dorian Stalling, and Is Global Warming Involved?
- What Does ’12 Years to Act on Climate Change’ (Now 11 Years) Really Mean?
- Satire publication The Onion acquires Alex Jones' Infowars at auction
- Unraveling a hidden cause of UTIs — plus how to prevent them
- The Taliban again bans Afghan women aid workers. Here's how the U.N. responded
- Tracking health threats, one sewage sample at a time
- Surprise bids revive hope for offshore wind in Gulf of Mexico after feds cancel lease sale
- Missouri to restrict gender-affirming care for trans adults this week
Ranking
- Secret Service Agent Allegedly Took Ex to Barack Obama’s Beach House
- It Took This Coal Miner 14 Years to Secure Black Lung Benefits. How Come?
- Germany Has Built Clean Energy Economy That U.S. Rejected 30 Years Ago
- Paris Hilton Mourns Death of “Little Angel” Dog Harajuku Bitch
- Certifying this year’s presidential results begins quietly, in contrast to the 2020 election
- Fear of pregnancy: One teen's story in post-Roe America
- Coal Boss Takes Climate Change Denial to the Extreme
- Paramedics who fell ill responding to Mexico hotel deaths face own medical bills
Recommendation
-
Fire crews gain greater control over destructive Southern California wildfire
-
Basketball powers Kansas and North Carolina will face each other in home-and-home series
-
Minnesota to join at least 4 other states in protecting transgender care this year
-
Julia Fox Frees the Nipple in See-Through Glass Top at Cannes Film Festival 2023
-
Taylor Swift Becomes Auntie Tay In Sweet Photo With Fellow Chiefs WAG Chariah Gordon's Daughter
-
With Greenland’s Extreme Melting, a New Risk Grows: Ice Slabs That Worsen Runoff
-
Today is 2023's Summer Solstice. Here's what to know about the official start of summer
-
Court Rejects Pipeline Rubber-Stamp, Orders Climate Impact Review